crime+scene+scriped

media type="custom" key="4714929" My name is Detective Maddi Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene to a beachhouse. The alleged victim was (You did not state the name of the victim) His name is Alfrado fettuchenie he was getting a drink for him and Felix.The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Alfrado and Kendra there motiveationis the reason they wanted to take his money. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the finding the posien in the ice cube tray.The evidence was found on the padieo.The test performed was the Ph. The results of the test were there was posien in the ice cube tray. This connects the suspect to the crime because they teasted tap water andit was natural and they teasted the ice cube water had base. (How does this prove Kendra's or Alfredo's guilt?) The next piece of evidence collected was the fingerprints.It was found on the cups which wereon the padieo. The test performed wasthe finger print enalisas. The results of the test were finger prints on Felixes cup. This connects the suspect Kendra beause she was Felixs cup besides Felix.

Another piece of evidence collected was it was the powder on the shouse. It was found on the ice cube tray and all over the crime secne.The test that was performed was the powder study. The results of the test were that Kendra had blood powder on her shouse. This connects the suspect to the crime because there was Kendras foot prints all over the house.

The last piece of evidence that was collected was the posien in felixes drink. It was found on the porch (Patio). The test performed was cola teast. The results of the test were that a reaguler cola had acid and Felixes cup had base. This connects the suspect to the crime because Kendra and Alfrado got the drinks. (This is an inference.)

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. (This is the step-by-step account of how they committed the crime) There was alot of evindce so hopfully we got the supect.Therefore, Kendra and Alfrado committed the crime of Felix Navad.The reason Kendra and Alfrado wanted to kill felix was because they herd that they were in his will and that they would get money.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 68% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__ Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  __** || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || __**The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.**__  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || __** Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  **__ || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || __**The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.**__ || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || **__Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information__**  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || **__Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery__**.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.__**  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.__**  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation__**.  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  __** || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  __** || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 38/57